Design Work
Screenshots and working pages show what was built.
Compare Senior Living Marketing Agencies
Compare agencies on care knowledge, useful work, staff duties, ownership, clear costs, and proof. Search rankings alone do not show client results.
Published by Occupancy Pros · Compare fairly
Type in the cells. Use task references, not private family or care details. Your edits stay on this page until you reload; download to keep them.
| Question | Provider A evidence | Provider B evidence | Open issue | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Specific tasks and staff duties | ||||
Design proof versus measured results | ||||
Full cost over the same period | ||||
Account access and exit terms |
Swipe the table to edit more fields.
Ask us the same hard questions you ask any provider. Compare the scope, people, evidence, costs, and account terms against the gap your community needs to fix.
See The Related Work ↗Inspect what was actually built.
Ask how any results were measured.
Confirm tasks, costs, and account access.

A Buyer Guide From A Marketing Agency
Screenshots and working pages show what was built.
Ask for source records, dates, and what else changed.
Get tasks, people, costs, and account terms in writing.
The supplied October 7, 2026 research names SeniorLivingSmart, Craft & Communicate, CCR Growth, and SeniorOI as useful agencies to examine. Occupancy Pros belongs in the comparison as the publisher’s own option. This is an interested-party buyer guide, not an independent award or a current best-to-worst ranking. An agency strong in one care setting may not fit another. Compare the proposed staff workflow rather than treating the shortlist as a recommendation for everyone.
In the dated Ahrefs comparison, SeniorLivingSmart has an estimated 1,040 monthly visits from senior-living keywords and domain rating 36. The page plan records SeniorOI first for the agency head term in that snapshot. These figures describe estimated search visibility, not actual client counts, care quality, revenue, or occupancy results. A website with many informational visits may attract readers who are not buyers. The estimate cannot tell you how many communities purchased agency services.

A proposal may include strategy, content, website work, ads, tools, or follow-up support. Those labels do not explain who answers the phone, checks care facts, hosts tours, or records a move-in. Ask each agency to describe the handoff and coverage clearly. A good fit should reduce confusion for the team. If an agency says it handles follow-up, ask whether that means reminders, live calls, or another task. Different coverage can change what staff must do.
A redesign can demonstrate clearer pages and a visible tour button. It does not prove more residents moved in. Ask for the period, starting point, method, and limits behind any result claim. A testimonial should be real and approved. Avoid treating an unattributed chart or a stock photo as customer evidence. For example, a clearer tour button proves a design change. A claim about extra held tours needs separate records and a defined review period.

Compare proposals using the same period and scope. Separate setup, service fees, ad spend, software, hosting, and possible exit costs. Ask who owns the website, accounts, content, and records, and what access remains if the work ends. The lowest headline price may not cover the work your community needs. An included website can still have ongoing hosting or tool charges. Your comparison should show which costs continue after the initial work ends.
Research you can inspect
| Agency | Dated research note | Question for your review |
|---|---|---|
| SeniorLivingSmart | Estimated 1,040 senior-keyword visits/month; DR 36 | Show comparable community work and measured results |
| Craft & Communicate | Research highlights homepage coverage | Which work and staff duties are included? |
| CCR Growth | Research highlights SEO/AEO page coverage | How are useful inquiries and tours tracked? |
| SeniorOI | Page plan records #1 agency head-term position in snapshot | What evidence supports the proposed community plan? |
| Occupancy Pros | Publisher’s own option; not independently ranked here | Confirm scope, staff duties, ownership, and current costs |
Clear answers before you call
Compare actual work, evidence, fees, staff duties, and access before choosing an agency.
No. Occupancy Pros publishes this guide and includes its own option. The supplied research provides a dated starting point for comparison, rather than a current best-to-worst award. Apply the same brief, evidence requests, and cost review to every provider so your community can make its own choice.
The supplied research highlights SeniorLivingSmart, Craft & Communicate, CCR Growth, and SeniorOI. Occupancy Pros is included as the publisher's option. Use these names to begin a review, then check each provider's current scope and relevant work. The list does not establish which agency will fit your community best.
Ask the agency to explain your care setting, common family questions, and the handoff from inquiry to staff. Review relevant work and the tasks it proposes for your team. Senior living knowledge is useful, but it still needs clear evidence, written terms, and a scope that addresses your actual problem.
Search traffic estimates describe visibility, rather than client service or occupancy results. They may include informational readers who never buy agency work. Keep the source date beside any research figure and ask separately for relevant completed work, how outcomes were measured, and what staff must do during the engagement.
Ask for actual work tied to a clear problem. For any result, request the starting point, dates, definitions, and source records, plus other changes during the period. A redesign screenshot can prove a design change. Extra tours or move-ins need their own evidence before you rely on that claim.
Give each agency the same brief with care types, locations, openings, staff capacity, and the main gap to fix. Compare specific page, search, ad, and follow-up tasks. Name approvals and reporting duties. Broad service labels do not show whether two proposals include the same work or need the same staff time.
Use the same period and community count, then list setup, service fees, media, tools, hosting, training, and exit costs where charged. Mark what is optional. A lower headline price may leave needed work outside the scope, so compare the total alongside the specific tasks and access terms.
Compare each provider’s written scope over the same period. Separate brand and website work, CRM setup, training, ongoing support, software, and ad spend. Check who owns the accounts, who reviews the work, and which tasks your staff still handles.
For Occupancy Pros, community staff handle care conversations, tours, and admissions, and approve care and cost facts. Ask every agency to name the staff work it expects. If follow-up support is offered, clarify whether it means reminders, live contact, or another task so no reply is left unowned.
Get the tasks, dates, costs, approval owners, account access, ownership terms, reporting, and exit steps in writing. Confirm who receives inquiries and what training is included. Before agreeing, check that the proposed work addresses the gap in your brief and that your team can carry out its assigned duties.
Start with a conversation
Tell us what needs work. We’ll talk through how marketing and CRM could help your team.